Australia and New Zealand vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Agriculture, forestry, fishing (highest government level expenditure)

Australia and New Zealand
3,677 million USD
in 2024
Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
10,778 million USD
in 2024
Australia and New Zealand rank
1st
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank
2nd

Agriculture, forestry, fishing (highest government level expenditure) over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
2.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k200120122024

How they compare

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) currently reports 10,778 million USD against 3,677 million USD in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 7,101 million USD.

That makes Least Developed Countries (LDCs)'s figure about 2.9 times Australia and New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 1st and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 2nd of 1 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 1 and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Least Developed Countries (LDCs) Difference Ahead
2000s 4,923 million USD 3,879 million USD 1,044 million USD Australia and New Zealand
2010s 3,685 million USD 6,756 million USD 3,071 million USD Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
2020s 3,615 million USD 9,025 million USD 5,410 million USD Least Developed Countries (LDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, fishing (highest government level expenditure), Australia and New Zealand or Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
Least Developed Countries (LDCs), at 10,778 million USD against 3,677 million USD in Australia and New Zealand as of 2024.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, fishing (highest government level expenditure) between Australia and New Zealand and Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
7,101 million USD, with Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank globally for agriculture, forestry, fishing (highest government level expenditure)?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 1st and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 2nd of 1 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agriculture, forestry, fishing (highest government level expenditure) — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Agriculture, forestry, fishing (highest government level expenditure). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-fishing-highest-government-level-expenditure-value-us-2015-prices/australia-and-new-zealand/least-developed-countries-ldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-fishing-highest-government-level-expenditure-value-us-2015-prices/australia-and-new-zealand/least-developed-countries-ldcs/">Australia and New Zealand vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Agriculture, forestry, fishing (highest government level expenditure)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, fishing (highest government level expenditure) — Value US$, 2015 prices
Unit
million USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
41 places, 984 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed

The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.