Europe vs Polynesia: Agriculture, forestry, fishing (highest government level expenditure)
Agriculture, forestry, fishing (highest government level expenditure) over time
- Europe
- Polynesia
How they compare
Europe currently reports 71,308 million USD against 18.7 million USD in Polynesia, a difference of 71,289 million USD.
That makes Europe's figure about 3,813.3 times Polynesia's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Europe has been ahead every year.
Europe ranks 6th and Polynesia ranks 6th of 33 groups.
Europe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Europe | Polynesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 73,091 million USD | 11.8 million USD | 73,079 million USD | Europe |
| 2010s | 60,348 million USD | 18.23 million USD | 60,330 million USD | Europe |
| 2020s | 67,505 million USD | 23.15 million USD | 67,481 million USD | Europe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, fishing (highest government level expenditure), Europe or Polynesia?
- Europe, at 71,308 million USD against 18.7 million USD in Polynesia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, fishing (highest government level expenditure) between Europe and Polynesia?
- 71,289 million USD, with Europe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Europe and Polynesia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Europe and Polynesia rank globally for agriculture, forestry, fishing (highest government level expenditure)?
- Europe ranks 6th and Polynesia ranks 6th of 33 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agriculture, forestry, fishing (highest government level expenditure) — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.