Polynesia vs Small island developing States (SIDS): Agriculture, forestry, fishing (highest government level expenditure)

Polynesia
18.7 million USD
in 2024
Small island developing States (SIDS)
3,226 million USD
in 2024
Polynesia rank
6th
Small island developing States (SIDS) rank
3rd

Agriculture, forestry, fishing (highest government level expenditure) over time

  • Polynesia
  • Small island developing States (SIDS)
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k5.0k200120122024

How they compare

Small island developing States (SIDS) currently reports 3,226 million USD against 18.7 million USD in Polynesia, a difference of 3,207 million USD.

That makes Small island developing States (SIDS)'s figure about 172.5 times Polynesia's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Small island developing States (SIDS) has been ahead every year.

Polynesia ranks 6th and Small island developing States (SIDS) ranks 3rd of 7 countries.

Small island developing States (SIDS) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Polynesia Small island developing States (SIDS) Difference Ahead
2000s 11.8 million USD 2,874 million USD 2,863 million USD Small island developing States (SIDS)
2010s 18.23 million USD 3,999 million USD 3,981 million USD Small island developing States (SIDS)
2020s 23.15 million USD 3,598 million USD 3,575 million USD Small island developing States (SIDS)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, fishing (highest government level expenditure), Polynesia or Small island developing States (SIDS)?
Small island developing States (SIDS), at 3,226 million USD against 18.7 million USD in Polynesia as of 2024.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, fishing (highest government level expenditure) between Polynesia and Small island developing States (SIDS)?
3,207 million USD, with Small island developing States (SIDS) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Polynesia and Small island developing States (SIDS)?
24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
How do Polynesia and Small island developing States (SIDS) rank globally for agriculture, forestry, fishing (highest government level expenditure)?
Polynesia ranks 6th and Small island developing States (SIDS) ranks 3rd of 7 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agriculture, forestry, fishing (highest government level expenditure) — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Polynesia vs Small island developing States (SIDS): Agriculture, forestry, fishing (highest government level expenditure). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-fishing-highest-government-level-expenditure-value-us-2015-prices/polynesia/small-island-developing-states-sids/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-fishing-highest-government-level-expenditure-value-us-2015-prices/polynesia/small-island-developing-states-sids/">Polynesia vs Small island developing States (SIDS): Agriculture, forestry, fishing (highest government level expenditure)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, fishing (highest government level expenditure) — Value US$, 2015 prices
Unit
million USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
41 places, 984 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed

The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.