Albania vs Sweden: Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Recurrent (central government)
Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Recurrent (central government) over time
- Albania
- Sweden
How they compare
Albania currently reports 9,411 million SLC against 6,956 million SLC in Sweden, a difference of 2,455 million SLC.
That makes Albania's figure about 1.4 times Sweden's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Sweden ahead.
Albania ranks 34th and Sweden ranks 37th of 94 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Albania | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 4,513 million SLC | 6,080 million SLC | 1,567 million SLC | Sweden |
| 2020s | 6,831 million SLC | 7,264 million SLC | 432.99 million SLC | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, fishing, recurrent (central government), Albania or Sweden?
- Albania, at 9,411 million SLC against 6,956 million SLC in Sweden as of 2022.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, fishing, recurrent (central government) between Albania and Sweden?
- 2,455 million SLC, with Albania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and Sweden?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
- How do Albania and Sweden rank globally for agriculture, forestry, fishing, recurrent (central government)?
- Albania ranks 34th and Sweden ranks 37th of 94 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Recurrent (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.