Angola vs Costa Rica: Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Recurrent (central government)
Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Recurrent (central government) over time
- Angola
- Costa Rica
How they compare
Angola currently reports 124,955 million SLC against 89,175 million SLC in Costa Rica, a difference of 35,780 million SLC.
That makes Angola's figure about 1.4 times Costa Rica's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Angola ranks 14th and Costa Rica ranks 17th of 94 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Costa Rica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 25,354 million SLC | 105,744 million SLC | 80,390 million SLC | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 72,083 million SLC | 85,139 million SLC | 13,056 million SLC | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, fishing, recurrent (central government), Angola or Costa Rica?
- Angola, at 124,955 million SLC against 89,175 million SLC in Costa Rica as of 2024.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, fishing, recurrent (central government) between Angola and Costa Rica?
- 35,780 million SLC, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Costa Rica?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2024.
- How do Angola and Costa Rica rank globally for agriculture, forestry, fishing, recurrent (central government)?
- Angola ranks 14th and Costa Rica ranks 17th of 94 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Recurrent (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.