Angola vs Malawi: Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Recurrent (central government)
Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Recurrent (central government) over time
- Angola
- Malawi
How they compare
Angola currently reports 124,955 million SLC against 89,530 million SLC in Malawi, a difference of 35,425 million SLC.
That makes Angola's figure about 1.4 times Malawi's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Angola ahead.
Angola ranks 14th and Malawi ranks 16th of 94 countries.
Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10,926 million SLC | 13,704 million SLC | 2,777 million SLC | Malawi |
| 2010s | 22,895 million SLC | 64,102 million SLC | 41,208 million SLC | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, fishing, recurrent (central government), Angola or Malawi?
- Angola, at 124,955 million SLC against 89,530 million SLC in Malawi as of 2024.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, fishing, recurrent (central government) between Angola and Malawi?
- 35,425 million SLC, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Malawi?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2017.
- How do Angola and Malawi rank globally for agriculture, forestry, fishing, recurrent (central government)?
- Angola ranks 14th and Malawi ranks 16th of 94 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Recurrent (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.