Argentina vs Cambodia: Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Recurrent (central government)
Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Recurrent (central government) over time
- Argentina
- Cambodia
How they compare
Cambodia currently reports 311,228 million SLC against 250,189 million SLC in Argentina, a difference of 61,039 million SLC.
That makes Cambodia's figure about 1.2 times Argentina's.
Across all 22 years both countries report, Cambodia has been ahead every year.
Argentina ranks 10th and Cambodia ranks 7th of 94 countries.
Cambodia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Cambodia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,440 million SLC | 79,046 million SLC | 77,606 million SLC | Cambodia |
| 2010s | 6,632 million SLC | 196,239 million SLC | 189,606 million SLC | Cambodia |
| 2020s | 42,652 million SLC | 308,242 million SLC | 265,591 million SLC | Cambodia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, fishing, recurrent (central government), Argentina or Cambodia?
- Cambodia, at 311,228 million SLC against 250,189 million SLC in Argentina as of 2022.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, fishing, recurrent (central government) between Argentina and Cambodia?
- 61,039 million SLC, with Cambodia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Cambodia?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2022.
- How do Argentina and Cambodia rank globally for agriculture, forestry, fishing, recurrent (central government)?
- Argentina ranks 10th and Cambodia ranks 7th of 94 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Recurrent (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.