Bangladesh vs Hungary: Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Recurrent (central government)
Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Recurrent (central government) over time
- Bangladesh
- Hungary
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 336,450 million SLC against 260,424 million SLC in Hungary, a difference of 76,026 million SLC.
That makes Bangladesh's figure about 1.3 times Hungary's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Hungary ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 6th and Hungary ranks 9th of 94 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 1 and Hungary in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Hungary | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 26,004 million SLC | 201,100 million SLC | 175,096 million SLC | Hungary |
| 2020s | 216,042 million SLC | 214,080 million SLC | 1,962 million SLC | Bangladesh |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, fishing, recurrent (central government), Bangladesh or Hungary?
- Bangladesh, at 336,450 million SLC against 260,424 million SLC in Hungary as of 2024.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, fishing, recurrent (central government) between Bangladesh and Hungary?
- 76,026 million SLC, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Hungary?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
- How do Bangladesh and Hungary rank globally for agriculture, forestry, fishing, recurrent (central government)?
- Bangladesh ranks 6th and Hungary ranks 9th of 94 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Recurrent (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.