Botswana vs New Caledonia: Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Recurrent (central government)
Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Recurrent (central government) over time
- Botswana
- New Caledonia
How they compare
New Caledonia currently reports 2,023 million SLC against 1,693 million SLC in Botswana, a difference of 330 million SLC.
That makes New Caledonia's figure about 1.2 times Botswana's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, New Caledonia has been ahead every year.
Botswana ranks 51st and New Caledonia ranks 48th of 94 countries.
New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, fishing, recurrent (central government), Botswana or New Caledonia?
- New Caledonia, at 2,023 million SLC against 1,693 million SLC in Botswana as of 2016.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, fishing, recurrent (central government) between Botswana and New Caledonia?
- 330 million SLC, with New Caledonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and New Caledonia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2016.
- How do Botswana and New Caledonia rank globally for agriculture, forestry, fishing, recurrent (central government)?
- Botswana ranks 51st and New Caledonia ranks 48th of 94 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Recurrent (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.