Dominican Republic vs Togo: Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Recurrent (central government)
Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Recurrent (central government) over time
- Dominican Republic
- Togo
How they compare
Togo currently reports 18,606 million SLC against 18,059 million SLC in Dominican Republic, a difference of 547 million SLC.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Togo ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 29th and Togo ranks 28th of 94 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 1 and Togo in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 10,134 million SLC | 13,998 million SLC | 3,865 million SLC | Togo |
| 2020s | 19,340 million SLC | 14,014 million SLC | 5,326 million SLC | Dominican Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, fishing, recurrent (central government), Dominican Republic or Togo?
- Togo, at 18,606 million SLC against 18,059 million SLC in Dominican Republic as of 2024.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, fishing, recurrent (central government) between Dominican Republic and Togo?
- 547 million SLC, with Togo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Togo?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do Dominican Republic and Togo rank globally for agriculture, forestry, fishing, recurrent (central government)?
- Dominican Republic ranks 29th and Togo ranks 28th of 94 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Recurrent (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.