Guinea vs Russian Federation: Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Recurrent (central government)
Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Recurrent (central government) over time
- Guinea
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Guinea currently reports 599,600 million SLC against 404,747 million SLC in Russian Federation, a difference of 194,853 million SLC.
That makes Guinea's figure about 1.5 times Russian Federation's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Russian Federation ahead.
Guinea ranks 2nd and Russian Federation ranks 5th of 94 countries.
Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 331,175 million SLC | 314,574 million SLC | 16,601 million SLC | Guinea |
| 2020s | 599,600 million SLC | 297,595 million SLC | 302,005 million SLC | Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, fishing, recurrent (central government), Guinea or Russian Federation?
- Guinea, at 599,600 million SLC against 404,747 million SLC in Russian Federation as of 2020.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, fishing, recurrent (central government) between Guinea and Russian Federation?
- 194,853 million SLC, with Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Russian Federation?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2020.
- How do Guinea and Russian Federation rank globally for agriculture, forestry, fishing, recurrent (central government)?
- Guinea ranks 2nd and Russian Federation ranks 5th of 94 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Recurrent (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.