Kenya vs Serbia: Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Recurrent (central government)
Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Recurrent (central government) over time
- Kenya
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 32,126 million SLC against 27,202 million SLC in Kenya, a difference of 4,924 million SLC.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.2 times Kenya's.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.
Kenya ranks 24th and Serbia ranks 22nd of 94 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10,040 million SLC | 16,272 million SLC | 6,232 million SLC | Serbia |
| 2010s | 15,989 million SLC | 25,920 million SLC | 9,931 million SLC | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, fishing, recurrent (central government), Kenya or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 32,126 million SLC against 27,202 million SLC in Kenya as of 2012.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, fishing, recurrent (central government) between Kenya and Serbia?
- 4,924 million SLC, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Serbia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2012.
- How do Kenya and Serbia rank globally for agriculture, forestry, fishing, recurrent (central government)?
- Kenya ranks 24th and Serbia ranks 22nd of 94 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Recurrent (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.