Russian Federation vs United Republic of Tanzania: Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Recurrent (central government)
Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Recurrent (central government) over time
- Russian Federation
- United Republic of Tanzania
How they compare
Russian Federation currently reports 404,747 million SLC against 330,968 million SLC in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 73,779 million SLC.
That makes Russian Federation's figure about 1.2 times United Republic of Tanzania's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Russian Federation ahead.
Russian Federation ranks 5th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 2nd of 94 countries.
Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Russian Federation | United Republic of Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 309,580 million SLC | 271,335 million SLC | 38,244 million SLC | Russian Federation |
| 2020s | 351,171 million SLC | 165,564 million SLC | 185,608 million SLC | Russian Federation |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, fishing, recurrent (central government), Russian Federation or United Republic of Tanzania?
- Russian Federation, at 404,747 million SLC against 330,968 million SLC in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2021.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, fishing, recurrent (central government) between Russian Federation and United Republic of Tanzania?
- 73,779 million SLC, with Russian Federation ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Russian Federation and United Republic of Tanzania?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2021.
- How do Russian Federation and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for agriculture, forestry, fishing, recurrent (central government)?
- Russian Federation ranks 5th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 2nd of 94 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Recurrent (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.