Republic of Moldova vs United Republic of Tanzania: Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Recurrent (central government)

Republic of Moldova
69.25 million USD
in 2024
United Republic of Tanzania
126.07 million USD
in 2024
Republic of Moldova rank
3rd
United Republic of Tanzania rank
2nd

Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Recurrent (central government) over time

  • Republic of Moldova
  • United Republic of Tanzania
050100150200250200220132024

How they compare

United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 126.07 million USD against 69.25 million USD in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 56.82 million USD.

That makes United Republic of Tanzania's figure about 1.8 times Republic of Moldova's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2008 it was United Republic of Tanzania ahead.

Republic of Moldova ranks 3rd and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 2nd of 3 countries.

United Republic of Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Republic of Moldova United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
2000s 50.02 million USD 74 million USD 23.98 million USD United Republic of Tanzania
2010s 40.6 million USD 90.9 million USD 50.3 million USD United Republic of Tanzania
2020s 71.44 million USD 139.78 million USD 68.34 million USD United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, fishing, recurrent (central government), Republic of Moldova or United Republic of Tanzania?
United Republic of Tanzania, at 126.07 million USD against 69.25 million USD in Republic of Moldova as of 2024.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, fishing, recurrent (central government) between Republic of Moldova and United Republic of Tanzania?
56.82 million USD, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Moldova and United Republic of Tanzania?
17 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2024.
How do Republic of Moldova and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for agriculture, forestry, fishing, recurrent (central government)?
Republic of Moldova ranks 3rd and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 2nd of 3 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Recurrent (central government expenditure) — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Republic of Moldova vs United Republic of Tanzania: Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Recurrent (central government). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-fishing-recurrent-central-government-expenditure-value-us-2015-prices/republic-of-moldova/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-fishing-recurrent-central-government-expenditure-value-us-2015-prices/republic-of-moldova/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Republic of Moldova vs United Republic of Tanzania: Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Recurrent (central government)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Recurrent (central government expenditure) — Value US$, 2015 prices
Unit
million USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
98 places, 1,294 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed

The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.