Dominican Republic vs Nepal: Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Recurrent (central government)
Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Recurrent (central government) over time
- Dominican Republic
- Nepal
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 303.19 million USD against 264.3 million USD in Nepal, a difference of 38.89 million USD.
That makes Dominican Republic's figure about 1.1 times Nepal's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Nepal ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 30th and Nepal ranks 33rd of 94 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 1 and Nepal in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 226.44 million USD | 264.48 million USD | 38.04 million USD | Nepal |
| 2020s | 312.07 million USD | 264.3 million USD | 47.77 million USD | Dominican Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, fishing, recurrent (central government), Dominican Republic or Nepal?
- Dominican Republic, at 303.19 million USD against 264.3 million USD in Nepal as of 2024.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, fishing, recurrent (central government) between Dominican Republic and Nepal?
- 38.89 million USD, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Nepal?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Dominican Republic and Nepal rank globally for agriculture, forestry, fishing, recurrent (central government)?
- Dominican Republic ranks 30th and Nepal ranks 33rd of 94 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Recurrent (central government expenditure) — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.