Poland vs Viet Nam: Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Recurrent (central government)
Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Recurrent (central government) over time
- Poland
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Poland currently reports 5,724 million USD against 164.67 million USD in Viet Nam, a difference of 5,559 million USD.
That makes Poland's figure about 34.8 times Viet Nam's.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.
Poland ranks 1st and Viet Nam ranks 1st of 94 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Poland | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4,436 million USD | 54.22 million USD | 4,382 million USD | Poland |
| 2010s | 3,066 million USD | 172.49 million USD | 2,893 million USD | Poland |
| 2020s | 3,529 million USD | 147.19 million USD | 3,382 million USD | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, fishing, recurrent (central government), Poland or Viet Nam?
- Poland, at 5,724 million USD against 164.67 million USD in Viet Nam as of 2023.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, fishing, recurrent (central government) between Poland and Viet Nam?
- 5,559 million USD, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Viet Nam?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2022.
- How do Poland and Viet Nam rank globally for agriculture, forestry, fishing, recurrent (central government)?
- Poland ranks 1st and Viet Nam ranks 1st of 94 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Recurrent (central government expenditure) — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.