Brazil vs Poland: Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Recurrent (general government)
Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Recurrent (general government) over time
- Brazil
- Poland
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 39,611 million SLC against 22,744 million SLC in Poland, a difference of 16,867 million SLC.
That makes Brazil's figure about 1.7 times Poland's.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Brazil has been ahead every year.
Brazil ranks 14th and Poland ranks 16th of 56 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 22,621 million SLC | 10,651 million SLC | 11,970 million SLC | Brazil |
| 2020s | 33,336 million SLC | 16,388 million SLC | 16,948 million SLC | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, fishing, recurrent (general government), Brazil or Poland?
- Brazil, at 39,611 million SLC against 22,744 million SLC in Poland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, fishing, recurrent (general government) between Brazil and Poland?
- 16,867 million SLC, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Poland?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Brazil and Poland rank globally for agriculture, forestry, fishing, recurrent (general government)?
- Brazil ranks 14th and Poland ranks 16th of 56 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Recurrent (general government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.