Poland vs South Africa: Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Recurrent (general government)
Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Recurrent (general government) over time
- Poland
- South Africa
How they compare
Poland currently reports 22,744 million SLC against 21,367 million SLC in South Africa, a difference of 1,377 million SLC.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.1 times South Africa's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Poland ahead.
Poland ranks 16th and South Africa ranks 17th of 56 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Poland averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Poland | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 12,496 million SLC | 9,185 million SLC | 3,311 million SLC | Poland |
| 2010s | 10,651 million SLC | 13,729 million SLC | 3,077 million SLC | South Africa |
| 2020s | 16,388 million SLC | 19,784 million SLC | 3,396 million SLC | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, fishing, recurrent (general government), Poland or South Africa?
- Poland, at 22,744 million SLC against 21,367 million SLC in South Africa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, fishing, recurrent (general government) between Poland and South Africa?
- 1,377 million SLC, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and South Africa?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2023.
- How do Poland and South Africa rank globally for agriculture, forestry, fishing, recurrent (general government)?
- Poland ranks 16th and South Africa ranks 17th of 56 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Recurrent (general government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.