Serbia vs South Africa: Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Recurrent (general government)
Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Recurrent (general government) over time
- Serbia
- South Africa
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 24,028 million SLC against 21,367 million SLC in South Africa, a difference of 2,661 million SLC.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times South Africa's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.
Serbia ranks 15th and South Africa ranks 17th of 56 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 13,596 million SLC | 7,035 million SLC | 6,561 million SLC | Serbia |
| 2010s | 24,028 million SLC | 10,301 million SLC | 13,727 million SLC | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, fishing, recurrent (general government), Serbia or South Africa?
- Serbia, at 24,028 million SLC against 21,367 million SLC in South Africa as of 2010.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, fishing, recurrent (general government) between Serbia and South Africa?
- 2,661 million SLC, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and South Africa?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2010.
- How do Serbia and South Africa rank globally for agriculture, forestry, fishing, recurrent (general government)?
- Serbia ranks 15th and South Africa ranks 17th of 56 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Recurrent (general government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.