South Africa vs Yemen: Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Recurrent (general government)
Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Recurrent (general government) over time
- South Africa
- Yemen
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 21,367 million SLC against 13,528 million SLC in Yemen, a difference of 7,839 million SLC.
That makes South Africa's figure about 1.6 times Yemen's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Yemen ahead.
South Africa ranks 17th and Yemen ranks 20th of 56 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, South Africa averaged higher in 1 and Yemen in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Africa | Yemen | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6,641 million SLC | 6,939 million SLC | 298.38 million SLC | Yemen |
| 2010s | 11,942 million SLC | 10,895 million SLC | 1,047 million SLC | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, fishing, recurrent (general government), South Africa or Yemen?
- South Africa, at 21,367 million SLC against 13,528 million SLC in Yemen as of 2023.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, fishing, recurrent (general government) between South Africa and Yemen?
- 7,839 million SLC, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Yemen?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2014.
- How do South Africa and Yemen rank globally for agriculture, forestry, fishing, recurrent (general government)?
- South Africa ranks 17th and Yemen ranks 20th of 56 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Recurrent (general government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.