Finland vs Kazakhstan: Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Recurrent (general government)
Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Recurrent (general government) over time
- Finland
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Finland currently reports 1,596 million USD against 1,439 million USD in Kazakhstan, a difference of 157 million USD.
That makes Finland's figure about 1.1 times Kazakhstan's.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Finland has been ahead every year.
Finland ranks 10th and Kazakhstan ranks 11th of 56 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,389 million USD | 710.28 million USD | 1,679 million USD | Finland |
| 2010s | 2,273 million USD | 1,248 million USD | 1,025 million USD | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, fishing, recurrent (general government), Finland or Kazakhstan?
- Finland, at 1,596 million USD against 1,439 million USD in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, fishing, recurrent (general government) between Finland and Kazakhstan?
- 157 million USD, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Kazakhstan?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2015.
- How do Finland and Kazakhstan rank globally for agriculture, forestry, fishing, recurrent (general government)?
- Finland ranks 10th and Kazakhstan ranks 11th of 56 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Recurrent (general government expenditure) — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.