Spain vs Viet Nam: Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Recurrent (general government)
Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Recurrent (general government) over time
- Spain
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Spain currently reports 6,528 million USD against 1,018 million USD in Viet Nam, a difference of 5,510 million USD.
That makes Spain's figure about 6.4 times Viet Nam's.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Spain has been ahead every year.
Spain ranks 4th and Viet Nam ranks 1st of 56 countries.
Spain has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Spain | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6,886 million USD | 267.14 million USD | 6,619 million USD | Spain |
| 2010s | 4,340 million USD | 1,007 million USD | 3,333 million USD | Spain |
| 2020s | 4,371 million USD | 1,030 million USD | 3,341 million USD | Spain |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, fishing, recurrent (general government), Spain or Viet Nam?
- Spain, at 6,528 million USD against 1,018 million USD in Viet Nam as of 2023.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, fishing, recurrent (general government) between Spain and Viet Nam?
- 5,510 million USD, with Spain ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Spain and Viet Nam?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2022.
- How do Spain and Viet Nam rank globally for agriculture, forestry, fishing, recurrent (general government)?
- Spain ranks 4th and Viet Nam ranks 1st of 56 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Recurrent (general government expenditure) — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.