Armenia vs Jerusalem: Air pollution - Cities and FUAs — Population exposure to PM10

Armenia
60.41 Microgrammes per cubic metre
in 2025
Jerusalem
259.89 Microgrammes per cubic metre
in 2025
Armenia rank
1st
Jerusalem rank
4th

Air pollution - Cities and FUAs — Population exposure to PM10 over time

  • Armenia
  • Jerusalem
0100200300202120232025

How they compare

Jerusalem currently reports 259.89 Microgrammes per cubic metre against 60.41 Microgrammes per cubic metre in Armenia, a difference of 199.48 Microgrammes per cubic metre.

That makes Jerusalem's figure about 4.3 times Armenia's.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Jerusalem has been ahead every year.

Armenia ranks 1st and Jerusalem ranks 4th of 2 countries.

Jerusalem has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher air pollution - cities and fuas — population exposure to pm10, Armenia or Jerusalem?
Jerusalem, at 259.89 Microgrammes per cubic metre against 60.41 Microgrammes per cubic metre in Armenia as of 2025.
What is the difference in air pollution - cities and fuas — population exposure to pm10 between Armenia and Jerusalem?
199.48 Microgrammes per cubic metre, with Jerusalem ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Jerusalem?
5 years are reported by both, from 2021 to 2025.
How do Armenia and Jerusalem rank globally for air pollution - cities and fuas — population exposure to pm10?
Armenia ranks 1st and Jerusalem ranks 4th of 2 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Air pollution - Cities and FUAs — Population exposure to PM10. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Armenia vs Jerusalem: Air pollution - Cities and FUAs — Population exposure to PM10. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/air-pollution-cities-and-fuas-population-exposure-to-pm10/armenia/jerusalem/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/air-pollution-cities-and-fuas-population-exposure-to-pm10/armenia/jerusalem/">Armenia vs Jerusalem: Air pollution - Cities and FUAs — Population exposure to PM10</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Air pollution - Cities and FUAs — Population exposure to PM10
Unit
Microgrammes per cubic metre
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
1,326 places, 6,630 data points, 2021–2025
Last refreshed

This dataset provides indicators of PM2.5, PM10 (particulate matter), ozone and nitrogen dioxide air pollution in FUAs and cities. Data sources and methodology Air pollution exposure is estimated using Plume Labs air pollution exposure grids for 3 air pollutants: nitrogen dioxide (NO2), fine particulate matters (PM2.5) and coarse particulate matters (PM10). The OECD obtained this dataset thanks to the Development Data Partnership, a collaboration between international organisations and technology companies, facilitating the efficient and responsible use of third-party data in international development. Average population exposure to air pollution is estimated at the local scale by computing the population-weighted average air pollutant concentration, using the Global Human Settlement Layer population grid (GHS-POP). PlumeLabs is used as it provides global, harmonised air pollution grids ensuring international comparability, complete subnational coverage, and consistent measurement of multiple pollutants, including in areas where national monitoring networks are sparse or incomplete. These estimates may differ from official subnational air quality statistics due to differences in methodological approaches, such as the use of modelled, top down pollution surfaces versus ground based monitoring networks, as well as variations in input data sources, spatial resolution, satellite retrieval methods, and the models used to simulate or interpolate pollutant concentrations. Defining FUAs and cities The OECD, in cooperation with the EU, has developed a harmonised definition of functional urban areas (FUAs) to capture the economic and functional reach of cities based on daily commuting patterns (OECD, 2012). FUAs consist of: A city – defined by urban centres in the degree of urbanisation, adapted to the closest local administrative units to define a city. A commuting zone – including all local areas where at least 15% of employed residents work in the city. The delineation process includes: Assigning municipalities surrounded by a single FUA to that FUA. Excluding non-contiguous municipalities. The correspondence table between SAUs and FUAs/cities is available in parquet and csv format. The definition identifies 1 272 FUAs and 1 269 cities in all OECD member countries except Costa Rica and four accession countries. Cite this dataset OECD Regions, cities and local areas database (Air pollution - Cities and FUAs), http://oe.cd/geostats Further information OECD Local Data Portal OECD Regions and Cities at a Glance For questions and/or comments, please email CitiesStat@oecd.org