Equatorial Guinea vs Sao Tome and Principe: All Animals — Amount excreted in manure

Equatorial Guinea
1.17 million kg
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
997,938 kg
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
181st
Sao Tome and Principe rank
183rd

All Animals — Amount excreted in manure over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Sao Tome and Principe
200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k1.0M1.2M196119922023

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 1.17 million kg against 997,938 kg in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 170,682 kg.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.2 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 181st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 183rd of 195 countries.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1960s 630,307 kg 320,032 kg 310,275 kg Equatorial Guinea
1970s 763,136 kg 271,211 kg 491,925 kg Equatorial Guinea
1980s 870,825 kg 327,950 kg 542,875 kg Equatorial Guinea
1990s 971,146 kg 420,404 kg 550,742 kg Equatorial Guinea
2000s 1.04 million kg 623,423 kg 420,349 kg Equatorial Guinea
2010s 1.12 million kg 843,253 kg 271,943 kg Equatorial Guinea
2020s 1.16 million kg 973,471 kg 186,971 kg Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all animals — amount excreted in manure, Equatorial Guinea or Sao Tome and Principe?
Equatorial Guinea, at 1.17 million kg against 997,938 kg in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2023.
What is the difference in all animals — amount excreted in manure between Equatorial Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe?
170,682 kg, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for all animals — amount excreted in manure?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 181st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 183rd of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as All Animals — Amount excreted in manure (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Sao Tome and Principe: All Animals — Amount excreted in manure. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-amount-excreted-in-manure-n-content/equatorial-guinea/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-amount-excreted-in-manure-n-content/equatorial-guinea/sao-tome-and-principe/">Equatorial Guinea vs Sao Tome and Principe: All Animals — Amount excreted in manure</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All Animals — Amount excreted in manure (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
248 places, 14,264 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).