Mauritania, Islamic Republic of vs Romania: All Animals — Amount excreted in manure

Mauritania, Islamic Republic of
400.36 million kg
in 2023
Romania
375.48 million kg
in 2023
Mauritania, Islamic Republic of rank
62nd
Romania rank
65th

All Animals — Amount excreted in manure over time

  • Mauritania, Islamic Republic of
  • Romania
200.0M400.0M600.0M800.0M1.0B196119922023

How they compare

Mauritania, Islamic Republic of currently reports 400.36 million kg against 375.48 million kg in Romania, a difference of 24.87 million kg.

That makes Mauritania, Islamic Republic of's figure about 1.1 times Romania's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Romania ahead.

Mauritania, Islamic Republic of ranks 62nd and Romania ranks 65th of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Mauritania, Islamic Republic of averaged higher in 1 and Romania in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritania, Islamic Republic of Romania Difference Ahead
1960s 211.15 million kg 604.02 million kg 392.87 million kg Romania
1970s 178.52 million kg 725.58 million kg 547.06 million kg Romania
1980s 187.42 million kg 893.86 million kg 706.44 million kg Romania
1990s 231.24 million kg 617.47 million kg 386.23 million kg Romania
2000s 314.80 million kg 455.61 million kg 140.81 million kg Romania
2010s 364.91 million kg 421.24 million kg 56.34 million kg Romania
2020s 396.10 million kg 390.08 million kg 6.03 million kg Mauritania, Islamic Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all animals — amount excreted in manure, Mauritania, Islamic Republic of or Romania?
Mauritania, Islamic Republic of, at 400.36 million kg against 375.48 million kg in Romania as of 2023.
What is the difference in all animals — amount excreted in manure between Mauritania, Islamic Republic of and Romania?
24.87 million kg, with Mauritania, Islamic Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania, Islamic Republic of and Romania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mauritania, Islamic Republic of and Romania rank globally for all animals — amount excreted in manure?
Mauritania, Islamic Republic of ranks 62nd and Romania ranks 65th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as All Animals — Amount excreted in manure (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritania, Islamic Republic of vs Romania: All Animals — Amount excreted in manure. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-amount-excreted-in-manure-n-content/mauritania/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-amount-excreted-in-manure-n-content/mauritania/romania/">Mauritania, Islamic Republic of vs Romania: All Animals — Amount excreted in manure</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All Animals — Amount excreted in manure (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
248 places, 14,264 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).