Australia and New Zealand vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): All Animals: Losses from manure treated (N content), annual
All Animals: Losses from manure treated (N content), annual over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
How they compare
Australia and New Zealand currently reports 7.81 % change on previous year against 1.1 % change on previous year in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), a difference of 6.71 % change on previous year.
That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 7.1 times Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s.
The two have swapped places 20 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 12th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 9th of 214 countries.
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.47 % change on previous year | 2.54 % change on previous year | 1.07 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1970s | 0.2522 % change on previous year | 2.26 % change on previous year | 2.01 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1980s | -0.4253 % change on previous year | 1.18 % change on previous year | 1.61 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1990s | 1.75 % change on previous year | 11.7 % change on previous year | 9.94 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2000s | 0.7286 % change on previous year | 3.77 % change on previous year | 3.04 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2010s | -0.4311 % change on previous year | 3.06 % change on previous year | 3.49 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2020s | 1.44 % change on previous year | 1.65 % change on previous year | 0.2086 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher all animals — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth, Australia and New Zealand or Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- Australia and New Zealand, at 7.81 % change on previous year against 1.1 % change on previous year in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in all animals — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth between Australia and New Zealand and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- 6.71 % change on previous year, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- 62 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank globally for all animals — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 12th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 9th of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.