Australia vs Middle Africa: All Animals: Losses from manure treated (N content), annual

Australia
15.18 % change on previous year
in 2023
Middle Africa
3.69 % change on previous year
in 2023
Australia rank
5th
Middle Africa rank
2nd

All Animals: Losses from manure treated (N content), annual over time

  • Australia
  • Middle Africa
-5051015196219922023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 15.18 % change on previous year against 3.69 % change on previous year in Middle Africa, a difference of 11.49 % change on previous year.

That makes Australia's figure about 4.1 times Middle Africa's.

The two have swapped places 16 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 5th and Middle Africa ranks 2nd of 214 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Middle Africa in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Middle Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 0.9525 % change on previous year 2.73 % change on previous year 1.77 % change on previous year Middle Africa
1970s 0.9636 % change on previous year 3.8 % change on previous year 2.84 % change on previous year Middle Africa
1980s -1.28 % change on previous year 3.16 % change on previous year 4.43 % change on previous year Middle Africa
1990s 1.64 % change on previous year 1.73 % change on previous year 0.0928 % change on previous year Middle Africa
2000s -0.3265 % change on previous year 3.36 % change on previous year 3.69 % change on previous year Middle Africa
2010s -1.08 % change on previous year 3.39 % change on previous year 4.47 % change on previous year Middle Africa
2020s 3.86 % change on previous year 3.26 % change on previous year 0.5951 % change on previous year Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all animals — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth, Australia or Middle Africa?
Australia, at 15.18 % change on previous year against 3.69 % change on previous year in Middle Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in all animals — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth between Australia and Middle Africa?
11.49 % change on previous year, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Middle Africa?
62 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
How do Australia and Middle Africa rank globally for all animals — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth?
Australia ranks 5th and Middle Africa ranks 2nd of 214 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Middle Africa: All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-annual-growth-rate/australia/middle-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-annual-growth-rate/australia/middle-africa/">Australia vs Middle Africa: All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
248 places, 14,016 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.