Belarus vs Czechia: All Animals: Losses from manure treated (N content), annual

Belarus
-0.3537 % change on previous year
in 2023
Czechia
-0.2987 % change on previous year
in 2023
Belarus rank
119th
Czechia rank
118th

All Animals: Losses from manure treated (N content), annual over time

  • Belarus
  • Czechia
-15-10-505199320082023

How they compare

Czechia currently reports -0.2987 % change on previous year against -0.3537 % change on previous year in Belarus, a difference of 0.055 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 17 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 119th and Czechia ranks 118th of 214 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 3 and Czechia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Czechia Difference Ahead
1990s -3.7 % change on previous year -5.1 % change on previous year 1.4 % change on previous year Belarus
2000s -1.32 % change on previous year -3.88 % change on previous year 2.56 % change on previous year Belarus
2010s -0.1471 % change on previous year -0.8496 % change on previous year 0.7025 % change on previous year Belarus
2020s -1.1 % change on previous year -0.6343 % change on previous year 0.4637 % change on previous year Czechia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all animals — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth, Belarus or Czechia?
Czechia, at -0.2987 % change on previous year against -0.3537 % change on previous year in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in all animals — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth between Belarus and Czechia?
0.055 % change on previous year, with Czechia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Czechia?
30 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Czechia rank globally for all animals — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth?
Belarus ranks 119th and Czechia ranks 118th of 214 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Czechia: All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-annual-growth-rate/belarus/czechia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-annual-growth-rate/belarus/czechia/">Belarus vs Czechia: All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
248 places, 14,016 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.