Botswana vs Czechoslovakia: All Animals: Losses from manure treated (N content), annual

Botswana
-7.73 % change on previous year
in 2023
Czechoslovakia
-8.58 % change on previous year
in 1992
Botswana rank
202nd
Czechoslovakia rank
203rd

All Animals: Losses from manure treated (N content), annual over time

  • Botswana
  • Czechoslovakia
-40-20020196219922023

How they compare

Botswana currently reports -7.73 % change on previous year against -8.58 % change on previous year in Czechoslovakia, a difference of 0.85 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Botswana ahead.

Botswana ranks 202nd and Czechoslovakia ranks 203rd of 214 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 3 and Czechoslovakia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Czechoslovakia Difference Ahead
1960s 1.63 % change on previous year -0.8913 % change on previous year 2.52 % change on previous year Botswana
1970s 4.74 % change on previous year 1.79 % change on previous year 2.95 % change on previous year Botswana
1980s 0.0683 % change on previous year 0.0241 % change on previous year 0.0441 % change on previous year Botswana
1990s -16.55 % change on previous year -4.22 % change on previous year 12.32 % change on previous year Czechoslovakia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all animals — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth, Botswana or Czechoslovakia?
Botswana, at -7.73 % change on previous year against -8.58 % change on previous year in Czechoslovakia as of 2023.
What is the difference in all animals — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth between Botswana and Czechoslovakia?
0.85 % change on previous year, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Czechoslovakia?
31 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 1992.
How do Botswana and Czechoslovakia rank globally for all animals — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth?
Botswana ranks 202nd and Czechoslovakia ranks 203rd of 214 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Czechoslovakia: All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-annual-growth-rate/botswana/czechoslovakia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-annual-growth-rate/botswana/czechoslovakia/">Botswana vs Czechoslovakia: All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
248 places, 14,016 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.