Côte d'Ivoire vs Djibouti: All Animals: Losses from manure treated (N content), annual

Côte d'Ivoire
0.2838 % change on previous year
in 2023
Djibouti
0.269 % change on previous year
in 2023
Côte d'Ivoire rank
97th
Djibouti rank
98th

All Animals: Losses from manure treated (N content), annual over time

  • Côte d'Ivoire
  • Djibouti
-20-1001020196219922023

How they compare

Côte d'Ivoire currently reports 0.2838 % change on previous year against 0.269 % change on previous year in Djibouti, a difference of 0.0148 % change on previous year.

That makes Côte d'Ivoire's figure about 1.1 times Djibouti's.

The two have swapped places 22 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Côte d'Ivoire ahead.

Côte d'Ivoire ranks 97th and Djibouti ranks 98th of 214 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Côte d'Ivoire averaged higher in 3 and Djibouti in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Côte d'Ivoire Djibouti Difference Ahead
1960s 7.68 % change on previous year 7.75 % change on previous year 0.0739 % change on previous year Djibouti
1970s 5.33 % change on previous year 7.65 % change on previous year 2.32 % change on previous year Djibouti
1980s 2.37 % change on previous year 14.14 % change on previous year 11.77 % change on previous year Djibouti
1990s 0.7921 % change on previous year 3.78 % change on previous year 2.99 % change on previous year Djibouti
2000s 2.21 % change on previous year 0.0252 % change on previous year 2.18 % change on previous year Côte d'Ivoire
2010s 2.37 % change on previous year 0.3822 % change on previous year 1.99 % change on previous year Côte d'Ivoire
2020s 0.4481 % change on previous year 0.0925 % change on previous year 0.3556 % change on previous year Côte d'Ivoire

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all animals — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth, Côte d'Ivoire or Djibouti?
Côte d'Ivoire, at 0.2838 % change on previous year against 0.269 % change on previous year in Djibouti as of 2023.
What is the difference in all animals — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth between Côte d'Ivoire and Djibouti?
0.0148 % change on previous year, with Côte d'Ivoire ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Djibouti?
62 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
How do Côte d'Ivoire and Djibouti rank globally for all animals — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth?
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 97th and Djibouti ranks 98th of 214 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Côte d'Ivoire vs Djibouti: All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-annual-growth-rate/cote-d-ivoire-3/djibouti/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-annual-growth-rate/cote-d-ivoire-3/djibouti/">Côte d'Ivoire vs Djibouti: All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
248 places, 14,016 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.