Ecuador vs Northern America: All Animals: Losses from manure treated (N content), annual

Ecuador
3.39 % change on previous year
in 2023
Northern America
-0.7171 % change on previous year
in 2023
Ecuador rank
30th
Northern America rank
28th

All Animals: Losses from manure treated (N content), annual over time

  • Ecuador
  • Northern America
-2002040196219922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 3.39 % change on previous year against -0.7171 % change on previous year in Northern America, a difference of 4.11 % change on previous year.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 4.7 times Northern America's.

The two have swapped places 22 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 30th and Northern America ranks 28th of 214 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 5 and Northern America in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Northern America Difference Ahead
1960s 3.74 % change on previous year -1.08 % change on previous year 4.82 % change on previous year Ecuador
1970s 3.28 % change on previous year -0.4979 % change on previous year 3.78 % change on previous year Ecuador
1980s -0.6503 % change on previous year -0.7761 % change on previous year 0.1258 % change on previous year Ecuador
1990s 3.22 % change on previous year -0.1132 % change on previous year 3.34 % change on previous year Ecuador
2000s 0.6864 % change on previous year 0.0281 % change on previous year 0.6583 % change on previous year Ecuador
2010s -0.1303 % change on previous year 0.579 % change on previous year 0.7093 % change on previous year Northern America
2020s -4 % change on previous year -0.7035 % change on previous year 3.3 % change on previous year Northern America

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all animals — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth, Ecuador or Northern America?
Ecuador, at 3.39 % change on previous year against -0.7171 % change on previous year in Northern America as of 2023.
What is the difference in all animals — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth between Ecuador and Northern America?
4.11 % change on previous year, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Northern America?
62 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Northern America rank globally for all animals — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth?
Ecuador ranks 30th and Northern America ranks 28th of 214 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Northern America: All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-annual-growth-rate/ecuador/northern-america/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-annual-growth-rate/ecuador/northern-america/">Ecuador vs Northern America: All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
248 places, 14,016 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.