Eritrea vs Palestine: All Animals: Losses from manure treated (N content), annual

Eritrea
0.0532 % change on previous year
in 2023
Palestine
-0.029 % change on previous year
in 2023
Eritrea rank
108th
Palestine rank
111th

All Animals: Losses from manure treated (N content), annual over time

  • Eritrea
  • Palestine
-50050100199420082023

How they compare

Eritrea currently reports 0.0532 % change on previous year against -0.029 % change on previous year in Palestine, a difference of 0.0822 % change on previous year.

That makes Eritrea's figure about 1.8 times Palestine's.

The two have swapped places 15 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Palestine ahead.

Eritrea ranks 108th and Palestine ranks 111th of 214 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 2 and Palestine in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eritrea Palestine Difference Ahead
1990s 10.37 % change on previous year 5.75 % change on previous year 4.63 % change on previous year Eritrea
2000s 5.53 % change on previous year 3.82 % change on previous year 1.71 % change on previous year Eritrea
2010s 1.06 % change on previous year 6.52 % change on previous year 5.46 % change on previous year Palestine
2020s 0.1119 % change on previous year 21.79 % change on previous year 21.68 % change on previous year Palestine

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all animals — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth, Eritrea or Palestine?
Eritrea, at 0.0532 % change on previous year against -0.029 % change on previous year in Palestine as of 2023.
What is the difference in all animals — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth between Eritrea and Palestine?
0.0822 % change on previous year, with Eritrea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Palestine?
29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do Eritrea and Palestine rank globally for all animals — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth?
Eritrea ranks 108th and Palestine ranks 111th of 214 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eritrea vs Palestine: All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-annual-growth-rate/eritrea/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-annual-growth-rate/eritrea/west-bank-and-gaza/">Eritrea vs Palestine: All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
248 places, 14,016 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.