Faroe Islands vs Singapore: All Animals: Losses from manure treated (N content), annual

Faroe Islands
16.34 % change on previous year
in 2023
Singapore
13.46 % change on previous year
in 2023
Faroe Islands rank
3rd
Singapore rank
6th

All Animals: Losses from manure treated (N content), annual over time

  • Faroe Islands
  • Singapore
-100-50050196219922023

How they compare

Faroe Islands currently reports 16.34 % change on previous year against 13.46 % change on previous year in Singapore, a difference of 2.88 % change on previous year.

That makes Faroe Islands's figure about 1.2 times Singapore's.

The two have swapped places 25 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Singapore ahead.

Faroe Islands ranks 3rd and Singapore ranks 6th of 214 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Faroe Islands averaged higher in 3 and Singapore in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Faroe Islands Singapore Difference Ahead
1960s -2 % change on previous year 1.5 % change on previous year 3.51 % change on previous year Singapore
1970s -2.6 % change on previous year 1.74 % change on previous year 4.34 % change on previous year Singapore
1980s 0.6252 % change on previous year -10.57 % change on previous year 11.2 % change on previous year Faroe Islands
1990s 0.9766 % change on previous year -11.59 % change on previous year 12.57 % change on previous year Faroe Islands
2000s -0.6003 % change on previous year 4.05 % change on previous year 4.65 % change on previous year Singapore
2010s -0.6125 % change on previous year 0.8212 % change on previous year 1.43 % change on previous year Singapore
2020s 1.04 % change on previous year -2.32 % change on previous year 3.36 % change on previous year Faroe Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all animals — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth, Faroe Islands or Singapore?
Faroe Islands, at 16.34 % change on previous year against 13.46 % change on previous year in Singapore as of 2023.
What is the difference in all animals — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth between Faroe Islands and Singapore?
2.88 % change on previous year, with Faroe Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Faroe Islands and Singapore?
62 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
How do Faroe Islands and Singapore rank globally for all animals — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth?
Faroe Islands ranks 3rd and Singapore ranks 6th of 214 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Faroe Islands vs Singapore: All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-annual-growth-rate/faroe-islands/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-annual-growth-rate/faroe-islands/singapore/">Faroe Islands vs Singapore: All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
248 places, 14,016 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.