Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Namibia: All Animals: Losses from manure treated (N content), annual
All Animals: Losses from manure treated (N content), annual over time
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 12.86 % change on previous year against 1.1 % change on previous year in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), a difference of 11.76 % change on previous year.
That makes Namibia's figure about 11.7 times Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s.
The two have swapped places 31 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 9th and Namibia ranks 7th of 34 groups.
Across the 7 decades both report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) averaged higher in 6 and Namibia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2.54 % change on previous year | 0.5953 % change on previous year | 1.95 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1970s | 2.26 % change on previous year | 0.1836 % change on previous year | 2.08 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1980s | 1.18 % change on previous year | -0.8607 % change on previous year | 2.04 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1990s | 11.7 % change on previous year | 1.08 % change on previous year | 10.61 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2000s | 3.77 % change on previous year | 1.92 % change on previous year | 1.85 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2010s | 3.06 % change on previous year | 1.72 % change on previous year | 1.35 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2020s | 1.65 % change on previous year | 5.58 % change on previous year | 3.94 % change on previous year | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher all animals — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 12.86 % change on previous year against 1.1 % change on previous year in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in all animals — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Namibia?
- 11.76 % change on previous year, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Namibia?
- 62 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
- How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Namibia rank globally for all animals — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth?
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 9th and Namibia ranks 7th of 34 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.