South Sudan vs United Republic of Tanzania: All Animals: Losses from manure treated (N content), annual

South Sudan
3.3 % change on previous year
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
3.26 % change on previous year
in 2023
South Sudan rank
32nd
United Republic of Tanzania rank
33rd

All Animals: Losses from manure treated (N content), annual over time

  • South Sudan
  • United Republic of Tanzania
-50510196219922023

How they compare

South Sudan currently reports 3.3 % change on previous year against 3.26 % change on previous year in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 0.04 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2013 it was United Republic of Tanzania ahead.

South Sudan ranks 32nd and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 33rd of 214 countries.

United Republic of Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Sudan United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
2010s 1.84 % change on previous year 2.58 % change on previous year 0.7368 % change on previous year United Republic of Tanzania
2020s 0.9653 % change on previous year 4.79 % change on previous year 3.83 % change on previous year United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all animals — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth, South Sudan or United Republic of Tanzania?
South Sudan, at 3.3 % change on previous year against 3.26 % change on previous year in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in all animals — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth between South Sudan and United Republic of Tanzania?
0.04 % change on previous year, with South Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and United Republic of Tanzania?
11 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2023.
How do South Sudan and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for all animals — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth?
South Sudan ranks 32nd and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 33rd of 214 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Sudan vs United Republic of Tanzania: All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-annual-growth-rate/south-sudan/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-annual-growth-rate/south-sudan/united-republic-of-tanzania/">South Sudan vs United Republic of Tanzania: All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
248 places, 14,016 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.