Botswana vs Suriname: All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita

Botswana
0.0695 kg per person
in 2023
Suriname
0.086 kg per person
in 2023
Botswana rank
137th
Suriname rank
134th

All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita over time

  • Botswana
  • Suriname
00.20.40.60.8196119922023

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 0.086 kg per person against 0.0695 kg per person in Botswana, a difference of 0.0165 kg per person.

That makes Suriname's figure about 1.2 times Botswana's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Botswana ahead.

Botswana ranks 137th and Suriname ranks 134th of 170 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 5 and Suriname in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Suriname Difference Ahead
1960s 0.6421 kg per person 0.2334 kg per person 0.4088 kg per person Botswana
1970s 0.7696 kg per person 0.1964 kg per person 0.5732 kg per person Botswana
1980s 0.5838 kg per person 0.2473 kg per person 0.3366 kg per person Botswana
1990s 0.273 kg per person 0.3023 kg per person 0.0292 kg per person Suriname
2000s 0.2025 kg per person 0.1258 kg per person 0.0767 kg per person Botswana
2010s 0.1334 kg per person 0.1075 kg per person 0.0259 kg per person Botswana
2020s 0.0717 kg per person 0.0886 kg per person 0.0169 kg per person Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all animals — losses from manure treated (n content), per capita, Botswana or Suriname?
Suriname, at 0.086 kg per person against 0.0695 kg per person in Botswana as of 2023.
What is the difference in all animals — losses from manure treated (n content), per capita between Botswana and Suriname?
0.0165 kg per person, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Suriname?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Suriname rank globally for all animals — losses from manure treated (n content), per capita?
Botswana ranks 137th and Suriname ranks 134th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Suriname: All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-capita/botswana/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-capita/botswana/suriname/">Botswana vs Suriname: All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita
Unit
kg per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
172 places, 9,878 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.