Afghanistan vs Chile: All Animals: Losses from manure treated (N content) … square

Afghanistan
13 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile
12.41 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Afghanistan rank
111th
Chile rank
112th

All Animals: Losses from manure treated (N content) … square over time

  • Afghanistan
  • Chile
510152025196119922023

How they compare

Afghanistan currently reports 13 kg per square kilometre against 12.41 kg per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 0.59 kg per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chile ahead.

Afghanistan ranks 111th and Chile ranks 112th of 170 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 2 and Chile in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan Chile Difference Ahead
1960s 3.82 kg per square kilometre 8.94 kg per square kilometre 5.11 kg per square kilometre Chile
1970s 4.4 kg per square kilometre 11.76 kg per square kilometre 7.36 kg per square kilometre Chile
1980s 3.87 kg per square kilometre 11.32 kg per square kilometre 7.46 kg per square kilometre Chile
1990s 5.39 kg per square kilometre 19.55 kg per square kilometre 14.17 kg per square kilometre Chile
2000s 9.13 kg per square kilometre 14.78 kg per square kilometre 5.65 kg per square kilometre Chile
2010s 12.91 kg per square kilometre 11.78 kg per square kilometre 1.14 kg per square kilometre Afghanistan
2020s 12.66 kg per square kilometre 12.37 kg per square kilometre 0.2818 kg per square kilometre Afghanistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all animals — losses from manure treated (n content), per square, Afghanistan or Chile?
Afghanistan, at 13 kg per square kilometre against 12.41 kg per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in all animals — losses from manure treated (n content), per square between Afghanistan and Chile?
0.59 kg per square kilometre, with Afghanistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Chile?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Afghanistan and Chile rank globally for all animals — losses from manure treated (n content), per square?
Afghanistan ranks 111th and Chile ranks 112th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Afghanistan vs Chile: All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/afghanistan/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/afghanistan/chile/">Afghanistan vs Chile: All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
172 places, 9,878 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.