Antigua and Barbuda vs Burundi: All Animals: Losses from manure treated (N content) … square

Antigua and Barbuda
69.51 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Burundi
65.59 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Antigua and Barbuda rank
61st
Burundi rank
62nd

All Animals: Losses from manure treated (N content) … square over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Burundi
050100150200196119922023

How they compare

Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 69.51 kg per square kilometre against 65.59 kg per square kilometre in Burundi, a difference of 3.92 kg per square kilometre.

That makes Antigua and Barbuda's figure about 1.1 times Burundi's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Antigua and Barbuda has been ahead every year.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 61st and Burundi ranks 62nd of 170 countries.

Antigua and Barbuda has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda Burundi Difference Ahead
1960s 70.27 kg per square kilometre 6.22 kg per square kilometre 64.05 kg per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
1970s 88.61 kg per square kilometre 9.75 kg per square kilometre 78.86 kg per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
1980s 151.39 kg per square kilometre 8.24 kg per square kilometre 143.14 kg per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
1990s 162.43 kg per square kilometre 8.63 kg per square kilometre 153.8 kg per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
2000s 155.88 kg per square kilometre 9.89 kg per square kilometre 145.99 kg per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
2010s 89.71 kg per square kilometre 27.83 kg per square kilometre 61.89 kg per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
2020s 72.44 kg per square kilometre 56.02 kg per square kilometre 16.43 kg per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all animals — losses from manure treated (n content), per square, Antigua and Barbuda or Burundi?
Antigua and Barbuda, at 69.51 kg per square kilometre against 65.59 kg per square kilometre in Burundi as of 2023.
What is the difference in all animals — losses from manure treated (n content), per square between Antigua and Barbuda and Burundi?
3.92 kg per square kilometre, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Burundi?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Burundi rank globally for all animals — losses from manure treated (n content), per square?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 61st and Burundi ranks 62nd of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Antigua and Barbuda vs Burundi: All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/antigua-and-barbuda/burundi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/antigua-and-barbuda/burundi/">Antigua and Barbuda vs Burundi: All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
172 places, 9,878 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.