Antigua and Barbuda vs Sweden: All Animals: Losses from manure treated (N content) … square

Antigua and Barbuda
69.51 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Sweden
60.77 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Antigua and Barbuda rank
61st
Sweden rank
64th

All Animals: Losses from manure treated (N content) … square over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Sweden
5075100125150175196119922023

How they compare

Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 69.51 kg per square kilometre against 60.77 kg per square kilometre in Sweden, a difference of 8.74 kg per square kilometre.

That makes Antigua and Barbuda's figure about 1.1 times Sweden's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sweden ahead.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 61st and Sweden ranks 64th of 170 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Antigua and Barbuda averaged higher in 5 and Sweden in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda Sweden Difference Ahead
1960s 70.27 kg per square kilometre 127.58 kg per square kilometre 57.31 kg per square kilometre Sweden
1970s 88.61 kg per square kilometre 104.82 kg per square kilometre 16.21 kg per square kilometre Sweden
1980s 151.39 kg per square kilometre 100.72 kg per square kilometre 50.67 kg per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
1990s 162.43 kg per square kilometre 90.22 kg per square kilometre 72.21 kg per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
2000s 155.88 kg per square kilometre 76.25 kg per square kilometre 79.63 kg per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
2010s 89.71 kg per square kilometre 66.66 kg per square kilometre 23.06 kg per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
2020s 72.44 kg per square kilometre 62.08 kg per square kilometre 10.37 kg per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all animals — losses from manure treated (n content), per square, Antigua and Barbuda or Sweden?
Antigua and Barbuda, at 69.51 kg per square kilometre against 60.77 kg per square kilometre in Sweden as of 2023.
What is the difference in all animals — losses from manure treated (n content), per square between Antigua and Barbuda and Sweden?
8.74 kg per square kilometre, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Sweden?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Sweden rank globally for all animals — losses from manure treated (n content), per square?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 61st and Sweden ranks 64th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Antigua and Barbuda vs Sweden: All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/antigua-and-barbuda/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/antigua-and-barbuda/sweden/">Antigua and Barbuda vs Sweden: All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
172 places, 9,878 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.