Barbados vs China: All Animals: Losses from manure treated (N content) … square

Barbados
140.15 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
China
133.81 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Barbados rank
40th
China rank
42nd

All Animals: Losses from manure treated (N content) … square over time

  • Barbados
  • China
50100150200250196119922023

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 140.15 kg per square kilometre against 133.81 kg per square kilometre in China, a difference of 6.34 kg per square kilometre.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Barbados has been ahead every year.

Barbados ranks 40th and China ranks 42nd of 170 countries.

Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados China Difference Ahead
1960s 172.91 kg per square kilometre 62.46 kg per square kilometre 110.45 kg per square kilometre Barbados
1970s 213.57 kg per square kilometre 79.34 kg per square kilometre 134.23 kg per square kilometre Barbados
1980s 253.05 kg per square kilometre 92.43 kg per square kilometre 160.62 kg per square kilometre Barbados
1990s 203.26 kg per square kilometre 126.18 kg per square kilometre 77.08 kg per square kilometre Barbados
2000s 145.04 kg per square kilometre 133.62 kg per square kilometre 11.42 kg per square kilometre Barbados
2010s 142.31 kg per square kilometre 120.9 kg per square kilometre 21.41 kg per square kilometre Barbados
2020s 140.25 kg per square kilometre 128.97 kg per square kilometre 11.28 kg per square kilometre Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all animals — losses from manure treated (n content), per square, Barbados or China?
Barbados, at 140.15 kg per square kilometre against 133.81 kg per square kilometre in China as of 2023.
What is the difference in all animals — losses from manure treated (n content), per square between Barbados and China?
6.34 kg per square kilometre, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and China?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Barbados and China rank globally for all animals — losses from manure treated (n content), per square?
Barbados ranks 40th and China ranks 42nd of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs China: All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/barbados/china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/barbados/china/">Barbados vs China: All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
172 places, 9,878 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.