Belize vs Zimbabwe: All Animals: Losses from manure treated (N content) … square

Belize
3.97 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
5.22 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Belize rank
139th
Zimbabwe rank
137th

All Animals: Losses from manure treated (N content) … square over time

  • Belize
  • Zimbabwe
23456196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 5.22 kg per square kilometre against 3.97 kg per square kilometre in Belize, a difference of 1.25 kg per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.3 times Belize's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

Belize ranks 139th and Zimbabwe ranks 137th of 170 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belize Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 2.19 kg per square kilometre 3.17 kg per square kilometre 0.9812 kg per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1970s 2.6 kg per square kilometre 4.77 kg per square kilometre 2.17 kg per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1980s 3.33 kg per square kilometre 4.75 kg per square kilometre 1.43 kg per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 2.3 kg per square kilometre 4.77 kg per square kilometre 2.47 kg per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 2.52 kg per square kilometre 4.69 kg per square kilometre 2.17 kg per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 3.55 kg per square kilometre 4.86 kg per square kilometre 1.31 kg per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 3.95 kg per square kilometre 4.93 kg per square kilometre 0.9723 kg per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all animals — losses from manure treated (n content), per square, Belize or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 5.22 kg per square kilometre against 3.97 kg per square kilometre in Belize as of 2023.
What is the difference in all animals — losses from manure treated (n content), per square between Belize and Zimbabwe?
1.25 kg per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Belize and Zimbabwe rank globally for all animals — losses from manure treated (n content), per square?
Belize ranks 139th and Zimbabwe ranks 137th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belize vs Zimbabwe: All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/belize/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/belize/zimbabwe/">Belize vs Zimbabwe: All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
172 places, 9,878 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.