Central African Republic vs Tunisia: All Animals: Losses from manure treated (N content) … square

Central African Republic
3.21 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
2.98 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Central African Republic rank
144th
Tunisia rank
146th

All Animals: Losses from manure treated (N content) … square over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Tunisia
01234196119922023

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 3.21 kg per square kilometre against 2.98 kg per square kilometre in Tunisia, a difference of 0.23 kg per square kilometre.

That makes Central African Republic's figure about 1.1 times Tunisia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Tunisia ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 144th and Tunisia ranks 146th of 170 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 1 and Tunisia in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Tunisia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2364 kg per square kilometre 1.71 kg per square kilometre 1.47 kg per square kilometre Tunisia
1970s 0.5133 kg per square kilometre 2.5 kg per square kilometre 1.99 kg per square kilometre Tunisia
1980s 1.22 kg per square kilometre 2.15 kg per square kilometre 0.9297 kg per square kilometre Tunisia
1990s 1.77 kg per square kilometre 2.97 kg per square kilometre 1.2 kg per square kilometre Tunisia
2000s 2.4 kg per square kilometre 3.86 kg per square kilometre 1.46 kg per square kilometre Tunisia
2010s 3.02 kg per square kilometre 3.37 kg per square kilometre 0.3529 kg per square kilometre Tunisia
2020s 3.17 kg per square kilometre 3.01 kg per square kilometre 0.1591 kg per square kilometre Central African Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all animals — losses from manure treated (n content), per square, Central African Republic or Tunisia?
Central African Republic, at 3.21 kg per square kilometre against 2.98 kg per square kilometre in Tunisia as of 2023.
What is the difference in all animals — losses from manure treated (n content), per square between Central African Republic and Tunisia?
0.23 kg per square kilometre, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Tunisia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Central African Republic and Tunisia rank globally for all animals — losses from manure treated (n content), per square?
Central African Republic ranks 144th and Tunisia ranks 146th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Tunisia: All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/tunisia/">Central African Republic vs Tunisia: All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
172 places, 9,878 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.