Congo vs Equatorial Guinea: All Animals: Losses from manure treated (N content) … square

Congo
0.4415 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea
0.304 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
165th
Equatorial Guinea rank
168th

All Animals: Losses from manure treated (N content) … square over time

  • Congo
  • Equatorial Guinea
0.10.20.30.4196119922023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0.4415 kg per square kilometre against 0.304 kg per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.1375 kg per square kilometre.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.5 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Congo ranks 165th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 168th of 170 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 3 and Equatorial Guinea in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0825 kg per square kilometre 0.1482 kg per square kilometre 0.0657 kg per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
1970s 0.1349 kg per square kilometre 0.1791 kg per square kilometre 0.0443 kg per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
1980s 0.1309 kg per square kilometre 0.1977 kg per square kilometre 0.0668 kg per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
1990s 0.1732 kg per square kilometre 0.2285 kg per square kilometre 0.0553 kg per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2000s 0.2775 kg per square kilometre 0.2561 kg per square kilometre 0.0215 kg per square kilometre Congo
2010s 0.4235 kg per square kilometre 0.2814 kg per square kilometre 0.1421 kg per square kilometre Congo
2020s 0.4395 kg per square kilometre 0.3003 kg per square kilometre 0.1392 kg per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all animals — losses from manure treated (n content), per square, Congo or Equatorial Guinea?
Congo, at 0.4415 kg per square kilometre against 0.304 kg per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in all animals — losses from manure treated (n content), per square between Congo and Equatorial Guinea?
0.1375 kg per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Equatorial Guinea?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for all animals — losses from manure treated (n content), per square?
Congo ranks 165th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 168th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Equatorial Guinea: All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/equatorial-guinea/">Congo vs Equatorial Guinea: All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
172 places, 9,878 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.