Cuba vs Rwanda: All Animals: Losses from manure treated (N content) … square

Cuba
52.71 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
46.72 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
69th
Rwanda rank
72nd

All Animals: Losses from manure treated (N content) … square over time

  • Cuba
  • Rwanda
020406080196119922023

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 52.71 kg per square kilometre against 46.72 kg per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 5.99 kg per square kilometre.

That makes Cuba's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 69th and Rwanda ranks 72nd of 170 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 5 and Rwanda in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 73.65 kg per square kilometre 7.15 kg per square kilometre 66.49 kg per square kilometre Cuba
1970s 74.71 kg per square kilometre 9.96 kg per square kilometre 64.74 kg per square kilometre Cuba
1980s 78.1 kg per square kilometre 12.49 kg per square kilometre 65.62 kg per square kilometre Cuba
1990s 71.23 kg per square kilometre 13.91 kg per square kilometre 57.32 kg per square kilometre Cuba
2000s 62.29 kg per square kilometre 28.7 kg per square kilometre 33.59 kg per square kilometre Cuba
2010s 59.33 kg per square kilometre 62.03 kg per square kilometre 2.7 kg per square kilometre Rwanda
2020s 47.77 kg per square kilometre 59.32 kg per square kilometre 11.56 kg per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all animals — losses from manure treated (n content), per square, Cuba or Rwanda?
Cuba, at 52.71 kg per square kilometre against 46.72 kg per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in all animals — losses from manure treated (n content), per square between Cuba and Rwanda?
5.99 kg per square kilometre, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Rwanda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Rwanda rank globally for all animals — losses from manure treated (n content), per square?
Cuba ranks 69th and Rwanda ranks 72nd of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Rwanda: All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/cuba/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/cuba/rwanda/">Cuba vs Rwanda: All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
172 places, 9,878 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.