Equatorial Guinea vs Libya: All Animals: Losses from manure treated (N content) … square

Equatorial Guinea
0.304 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Libya
0.1103 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
168th
Libya rank
170th

All Animals: Losses from manure treated (N content) … square over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Libya
00.10.20.3196119922023

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0.304 kg per square kilometre against 0.1103 kg per square kilometre in Libya, a difference of 0.1937 kg per square kilometre.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 2.8 times Libya's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 168th and Libya ranks 170th of 170 countries.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Libya Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1482 kg per square kilometre 0.0291 kg per square kilometre 0.1191 kg per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
1970s 0.1791 kg per square kilometre 0.0484 kg per square kilometre 0.1307 kg per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
1980s 0.1977 kg per square kilometre 0.0687 kg per square kilometre 0.129 kg per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
1990s 0.2285 kg per square kilometre 0.0792 kg per square kilometre 0.1493 kg per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2000s 0.2561 kg per square kilometre 0.0842 kg per square kilometre 0.1719 kg per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2010s 0.2814 kg per square kilometre 0.1103 kg per square kilometre 0.1711 kg per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2020s 0.3003 kg per square kilometre 0.1097 kg per square kilometre 0.1906 kg per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all animals — losses from manure treated (n content), per square, Equatorial Guinea or Libya?
Equatorial Guinea, at 0.304 kg per square kilometre against 0.1103 kg per square kilometre in Libya as of 2023.
What is the difference in all animals — losses from manure treated (n content), per square between Equatorial Guinea and Libya?
0.1937 kg per square kilometre, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Libya?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Libya rank globally for all animals — losses from manure treated (n content), per square?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 168th and Libya ranks 170th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Libya: All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/libya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/libya/">Equatorial Guinea vs Libya: All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
172 places, 9,878 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.