Sri Lanka vs Trinidad and Tobago: All Animals: Losses from manure treated (N content) … square

Sri Lanka
20.38 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
21.43 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Sri Lanka rank
99th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
96th

All Animals: Losses from manure treated (N content) … square over time

  • Sri Lanka
  • Trinidad and Tobago
10203040196119922023

How they compare

Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 21.43 kg per square kilometre against 20.38 kg per square kilometre in Sri Lanka, a difference of 1.05 kg per square kilometre.

That makes Trinidad and Tobago's figure about 1.1 times Sri Lanka's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sri Lanka ahead.

Sri Lanka ranks 99th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 96th of 170 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Sri Lanka averaged higher in 2 and Trinidad and Tobago in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sri Lanka Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1960s 24.57 kg per square kilometre 15.4 kg per square kilometre 9.18 kg per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1970s 22.35 kg per square kilometre 20.56 kg per square kilometre 1.8 kg per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1980s 24.66 kg per square kilometre 28.34 kg per square kilometre 3.68 kg per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1990s 23.39 kg per square kilometre 37.51 kg per square kilometre 14.12 kg per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2000s 15.77 kg per square kilometre 38.66 kg per square kilometre 22.89 kg per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2010s 18.5 kg per square kilometre 24.99 kg per square kilometre 6.48 kg per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2020s 20.59 kg per square kilometre 22.03 kg per square kilometre 1.43 kg per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all animals — losses from manure treated (n content), per square, Sri Lanka or Trinidad and Tobago?
Trinidad and Tobago, at 21.43 kg per square kilometre against 20.38 kg per square kilometre in Sri Lanka as of 2023.
What is the difference in all animals — losses from manure treated (n content), per square between Sri Lanka and Trinidad and Tobago?
1.05 kg per square kilometre, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Trinidad and Tobago?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Sri Lanka and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for all animals — losses from manure treated (n content), per square?
Sri Lanka ranks 99th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 96th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sri Lanka vs Trinidad and Tobago: All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/sri-lanka/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/sri-lanka/trinidad-and-tobago/">Sri Lanka vs Trinidad and Tobago: All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
172 places, 9,878 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.