Sub-Saharan Africa vs Tuvalu: All Animals: Losses from manure treated (N content) … square

Sub-Saharan Africa
6.14 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Tuvalu
2,327 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
2nd
Tuvalu rank
1st

All Animals: Losses from manure treated (N content) … square over time

  • Sub-Saharan Africa
  • Tuvalu
05001.0k1.5k2.0k2.5k196119922023

How they compare

Tuvalu currently reports 2,327 kg per square kilometre against 6.14 kg per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 2,321 kg per square kilometre.

That makes Tuvalu's figure about 379.1 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Tuvalu has been ahead every year.

Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 2nd and Tuvalu ranks 1st of 2 groups.

Tuvalu has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sub-Saharan Africa Tuvalu Difference Ahead
1960s 1.83 kg per square kilometre 868.23 kg per square kilometre 866.4 kg per square kilometre Tuvalu
1970s 2.17 kg per square kilometre 880.4 kg per square kilometre 878.23 kg per square kilometre Tuvalu
1980s 2.64 kg per square kilometre 1,255 kg per square kilometre 1,252 kg per square kilometre Tuvalu
1990s 3.12 kg per square kilometre 2,011 kg per square kilometre 2,008 kg per square kilometre Tuvalu
2000s 3.89 kg per square kilometre 2,132 kg per square kilometre 2,128 kg per square kilometre Tuvalu
2010s 5.17 kg per square kilometre 2,237 kg per square kilometre 2,232 kg per square kilometre Tuvalu
2020s 5.95 kg per square kilometre 2,313 kg per square kilometre 2,307 kg per square kilometre Tuvalu

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all animals — losses from manure treated (n content), per square, Sub-Saharan Africa or Tuvalu?
Tuvalu, at 2,327 kg per square kilometre against 6.14 kg per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in all animals — losses from manure treated (n content), per square between Sub-Saharan Africa and Tuvalu?
2,321 kg per square kilometre, with Tuvalu ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sub-Saharan Africa and Tuvalu?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Sub-Saharan Africa and Tuvalu rank globally for all animals — losses from manure treated (n content), per square?
Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 2nd and Tuvalu ranks 1st of 2 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sub-Saharan Africa vs Tuvalu: All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/sub-saharan-africa/tuvalu/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/sub-saharan-africa/tuvalu/">Sub-Saharan Africa vs Tuvalu: All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
172 places, 9,878 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.