Palestine vs Zimbabwe: All Animals: Losses from manure treated (N content) … square

Palestine
5.67 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
5.22 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Palestine rank
136th
Zimbabwe rank
137th

All Animals: Losses from manure treated (N content) … square over time

  • Palestine
  • Zimbabwe
2468196119922023

How they compare

Palestine currently reports 5.67 kg per square kilometre against 5.22 kg per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.45 kg per square kilometre.

That makes Palestine's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Palestine ranks 136th and Zimbabwe ranks 137th of 170 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Palestine averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Palestine Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 2.52 kg per square kilometre 4.73 kg per square kilometre 2.2 kg per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 3.98 kg per square kilometre 4.69 kg per square kilometre 0.7075 kg per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 4.31 kg per square kilometre 4.86 kg per square kilometre 0.5539 kg per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 5.44 kg per square kilometre 4.93 kg per square kilometre 0.5174 kg per square kilometre Palestine

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all animals — losses from manure treated (n content), per square, Palestine or Zimbabwe?
Palestine, at 5.67 kg per square kilometre against 5.22 kg per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in all animals — losses from manure treated (n content), per square between Palestine and Zimbabwe?
0.45 kg per square kilometre, with Palestine ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Palestine and Zimbabwe?
30 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2023.
How do Palestine and Zimbabwe rank globally for all animals — losses from manure treated (n content), per square?
Palestine ranks 136th and Zimbabwe ranks 137th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Palestine vs Zimbabwe: All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/west-bank-and-gaza/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/west-bank-and-gaza/zimbabwe/">Palestine vs Zimbabwe: All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
172 places, 9,878 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.