Australia vs Eswatini: All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP

Australia
0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Eswatini
0 kg per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Australia rank
102nd
Eswatini rank
105th

All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP over time

  • Australia
  • Eswatini
00.0010.0020.0030.004196119922023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP against 0 kg per US$ of GDP in Eswatini, a difference of 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Eswatini ahead.

Australia ranks 102nd and Eswatini ranks 105th of 169 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 6 and Eswatini in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Eswatini Difference Ahead
1960s 0.003 kg per US$ of GDP 0.0029 kg per US$ of GDP 0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP Australia
1970s 0.0013 kg per US$ of GDP 0.001 kg per US$ of GDP 0.0003 kg per US$ of GDP Australia
1980s 0.0004 kg per US$ of GDP 0.0004 kg per US$ of GDP 0 kg per US$ of GDP Eswatini
1990s 0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP 0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP Australia
2000s 0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP Australia
2010s 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP 0 kg per US$ of GDP Australia
2020s 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP 0 kg per US$ of GDP 0 kg per US$ of GDP Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all animals — losses from manure treated (n content), per unit of gdp, Australia or Eswatini?
Australia, at 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP against 0 kg per US$ of GDP in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in all animals — losses from manure treated (n content), per unit of gdp between Australia and Eswatini?
0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Eswatini?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and Eswatini rank globally for all animals — losses from manure treated (n content), per unit of gdp?
Australia ranks 102nd and Eswatini ranks 105th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Eswatini: All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-unit-of-gdp/australia/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-unit-of-gdp/australia/eswatini/">Australia vs Eswatini: All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP
Unit
kg per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 9,202 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.