How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Georgia?

32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chile vs Georgia: All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP

Chile

0 kg per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Georgia

0 kg per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Chile rank

119th

Georgia rank

120th

All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP over time

Chile
Georgia

How they compare

Chile currently reports 0 kg per US$ of GDP against 0 kg per US$ of GDP in Georgia, a difference of 0 kg per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Georgia ahead.

Chile ranks 119th and Georgia ranks 120th of 169 countries.

Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chile	Georgia	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0005 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP	Georgia
2000s	0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0003 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP	Georgia
2010s	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	Georgia
2020s	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all animals — losses from manure treated (n content), per unit of gdp, Chile or Georgia?: Chile, at 0 kg per US$ of GDP against 0 kg per US$ of GDP in Georgia as of 2023.
What is the difference in all animals — losses from manure treated (n content), per unit of gdp between Chile and Georgia?: 0 kg per US$ of GDP, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Georgia?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Chile and Georgia rank globally for all animals — losses from manure treated (n content), per unit of gdp?: Chile ranks 119th and Georgia ranks 120th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Georgia: All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-unit-of-gdp/chile/georgia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-unit-of-gdp/chile/georgia/">Chile vs Georgia: All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP
Unit: kg per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 171 places, 9,202 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 05 October 2026

All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.